Arsenal Player Ratings vs Reading: By Lloyd the Gooner

By on October 31, 2012

Olivier-Giroud

If you know anything about football you know that it reveals the character of a man. The first half reeked of complacency. It had the odour of arrogance. The second half and extra time saved one or two futures at the club. The manager I suspect will not forget that first half: NEITHER SHOULD WE.

That said there was an abundance of character after half time. And in Eisfeld is a star born? Here are Lloyd the Gooners’ player ratings:

Martinez. Not marked. I am not prepared to criticise a young man who may yet turn out to be a great and say something utterly unfair. Let’s put it down to inexperience.

Jenkinson 6. Part of a useless first half defence and technically not at his best going forward. But as you would expect from our Puyol – great attitude as seen in the ‘goal’.

Koscielny 5. His attitude stank the place out first half. At fault here, there and everywhere. A late header fools nobody. The only mitigation would be that he realised how bad he was and did something about it.

Djourou 5. As with others, part of a useless first half defence. Just nowhere near what we all hoped he would become. But as with his partner showed up well later on.

Miquel 4. Inapt and inept at fullback. Clearly a centre back trying his best. In my view Meade would have been a better bet from the start.

Coquelin 4. You tell me. Bad game or thought he had made it and therefore was better than the Reading players? Nowhere near his opponents first half. “Remember who you are what you are and who you represent” : Arsenal mantra.

Frimpong 4. I refuse to believe this player thought he was too good to have to run. But ineffective to say the least. Needs games, but these are games. Shake off the lethargy Manny!

Gnabry 5. Clearly a talent. Errors against Schalke tempered unrealistic expectations and tonight confirmed that talent needs to be disciplined.

Arshavin 6. Never hides and tries the ball that others won’t. But not the playmaker we need.

Chamakh 6. On his way out of the club in January still, I suspect but, as with so many others, did try from half time onwards.

Walcott 6. He is a striker. A Michael Owen. Sign da ting. Simples!

Subs.

Giroud 7. Excellent attitude. Scored and affected the game so positively.

Eisfeld 9. Technically spot on. Those who follow the club closely knew of his goal potential but we saw a virtually COMPLETE midfield performance. The impressive thing was that from the first touch he looked comfortable, unhurried and classy.

Mead 6. Had he been on throughout we would have been weakened in the air. But, we would have had a player on the pitch that at least knew the position he was playing. Did well and you can’t have too many gooners on the pitch, can you?

Agree with my ratings? Leave your opinion in the comments….

Fancy a flutter on the game? Claim your £10 welcome bonus at Sky Bet and enjoy some of the best match odds in the business.

Best of the web

12 Comments

  1. Darren

    October 31, 2012 at 9:34 pm

    You obviously know nothing about football has you gave Walcott a 6!! He was the best player on the pitch by far!!

  2. kasangaki

    October 31, 2012 at 9:55 pm

    I dont know u watch the game wallcot.arshavin.where Man of the Match.my be u drack.

    • gooner4life

      October 31, 2012 at 11:29 pm

      I know I am right….AHAHAHAHAHAHA…….PISSIN MY SELF…..AHAHAHAA so funny!!!!!!

  3. Clockend Lloydie

    October 31, 2012 at 10:01 pm

    To those of you who know me. This is not an article by me.

    Salut.

    • gooner4life

      October 31, 2012 at 11:33 pm

      from inbetweeners……Neeemmmmneeeemmneemnemneeeeeemmmmmm!!!! u jackass

      • Goonerboyo

        November 1, 2012 at 10:55 pm

        Goonnerforlife
        Lloyd is quite right and those of us who have followed this club for fifty years know this.
        If we play with the attitude, complacency and incompetence against any other half decent premier league club, we will be stuffed. His ratings are fair in the light of half a match of actual performance. A remarkable recovery but one we should not have had to make.
        Please hold back on the immature non sensical rants and respect the opinions of genuine
        Knowledgeable gooners.

  4. Main

    October 31, 2012 at 10:34 pm

    You’re an idiot. Stop this nonsense and stop wasting people’s time with this crap. Learn the game you’re commenting on.

    • gooner4life

      October 31, 2012 at 11:24 pm

      He wasted my time too……fake fan init

  5. David

    October 31, 2012 at 10:54 pm

    Nonsence article

    • gooner4life

      October 31, 2012 at 11:24 pm

      Init brav

  6. gooner4life

    October 31, 2012 at 11:18 pm

    I agree. This guy knows nothing: Walcott got a hat trick mate – why the hell would you give him a 6. Chamakh showed true qualities of a out-and-out striker and took his chances; his good link up play and two goals at least deserve more than a bloody 6 don’t they? Gnabry I thought did really well but then faltered – giving a 5 is completely absurd. And that leaves Arshavin: the Russian maestro did no have the best the first half, nor did anyone else really)but still slipped it through for Walcott to lift over the out-rushing keeper but he came to life afterwards – did you see that brilliant run to set up Walcott to make it 4-4? By the looks of it you didn’t even watch the match after 4-0.
    So now, I can reveal……..you don’t know a thing about football.

  7. Wamala

    November 1, 2012 at 7:45 am

    P’se no body is forcing u to write, so if u dont hv or know what to write, i beg of u, keep your stupidity to your self

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *